Study of Package Fraction Fraction Sensitivity TRISO in Design of HTR Pebble Bed Criticality

Zuhair Zuhair, Suwoto Suwoto

Abstract


HTR is a high temperature reactor used for electricity production and process heat applications such as hydrogen production, desalination of sea water, enhanced oil recovery and so on. HTR is designed based on the utilization of TRISO fuel particles that can prevent strongly the escape of fission products even at temperatures above 1600 oC. TRISO particles packing fraction is one of four key parameters that are essential in HTR design besides radius of the kernel, kernel density and fuel enrichment. This paper discusses the sensitivity of TRISO particles packing fraction that impacts to the loading of uranium in the fuel pebble, the long cycle of reactor operation and achievable maximum fuel burn-up. With the capability of Monte Carlo transport code MCNP5, all components of the reactor, starting from TRISO particles, were modeled in detail and explicit and calculated using the continuous energy nuclear data library ENDF/B-VI. The results show that the value of effective multiplication factor (keff) has a tendency to increase with decreasing particle TRISO packing fraction and to decrease with increasing fuel burn-up. Keff values decrease with increasing TRISO particle packing fraction both at the beginning of cycle (BOC) and at the end of cycle (EOC). Reactivity swing is also very sensitive on the TRISO particles packing fraction. From the analysis, it can be concluded that TRISO particles packing fraction greatly affects the neutronics performance of HTR pebble bed design. Packing fraction can change the effective multiplication factor (keff) and the swing reactivity with similar behavior.


Keywords


packing fraction, TRISO particle, HTR pebble bed, keff, swing reactivity.

Full Text:

PDF

References


G.H. Lohnert (2002), Topical Issue on China’s HTR-10, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design, 218, 1-3.

G.H. Lohnert (2004), Topical Issue on Japan’s HTTR, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design, 233, 1-3.

A. Habush, A. Harris (1968), 330-MW(e) Fort St. Vrain Hogh-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design, 312

______ (May 1971), Das 300 MW Thorium Hochtemperatur-Kernkraftwerk THTR, Atomwirtschaft

A. Koster, H.D. Matzner, and D.R. Nicholsi (2003), PBMR Design for the Future, Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Design, 222, 231-245.

______ (Aug 2002), GT-MHR Conceptual Design Description Report, General Atomics, GA/NRC-337-02.

P.E. McDonald (March 4-5, 2004), Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP): A Very High Temperature Gas-cooled Reactor (VHTR), Proceedings of US-DOE Advanced Reactor, Fuel Cycle and Energy Products Workshop for Universities, Gaithersburg, USA.

Zuhair, Suwoto (14 Juli, 2009), Studi Perhitungan Faktor Multiplikasi Reakor Pebble-Bed Sebagai Fungsi Radius Kernel Bahan Bakar Pada Berbagai Pengkayaan, Prosiding Pertemuan dan Presentasi Ilmiah Penelitian Dasar Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Nuklir, Yogyakarta.

F.B. Brown, et al. (April 24, 2003), MCNP – A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5, LA-UR-03-1987.

J.S. Hendricks, S.C. Frankle, J.D. Court (1994), ENDF/B-VI Data for MCNP, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-12891.

Üner Colak, Volkan Şeker (Feb 2005), Monte Carlo Criticality Calculations for a Pebble Bed Reactor with MCNP, Journal of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 149[2].

A. Kitamura, J. Matsumoto, Y. FuruyamaA, A. Taniike, N. Kubota, T. Ohsawa, K. Hashimoto, T. Horiuchi and T. Tsuruta (May 2003), Measurements and Analysis of Neutron Flux Distribution in UTR-KINKI, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 40[5], 349-355.

H. Sono, H. Yanagisawa, K. Nakajima and Y. Miyoshi (Oct 20-24, 2003), Analyses of Criticality and Reactivity for TRACY Experiments Based on JENDL-3.2 Data Library, Proceedings of The 7-th International Conference on Nuclear Criticality Safety (ICNC’2003), Tokai, Japan.

Tagor M. Sembiring and Zuhair (Mar 21-24, 2004), Criticality Safety Assessment on the RSG-GAS Fresh Fuel Storage for Anticipating the Next Core Conversion Program, Proceedings of The 8-th International Topical Meeting on Research Reactor Fuel Management (RRFM’2004), München, Germany.

S. Satoh, H. Iida (2000), ITER Shielding Analysis by 3D Monte Carlo Method, Present Status and Problems of Particle Simulation by Monte Carlo Method, Atomic Energy Society, Japan, 193.

F. Maekawa, K. Ochiai, K. Shibata, Y. Kasugai, M. Wada, Y. Morimoto, H. Takeuchi (2001), Benchmark Experiment on Silicon Carbide with D-T Neutrons and Validation of Nuclear Data Libraries, Journal of Fusion Engineering and Design, 58-59, 595-600.

K. Tuček, J. Wallenius, W. Gudowski (2004), Coolant Void Worth in Fast Breeder Reactors and Accelerator-driven Transuranium and Minor-actinide Burners, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 31, 1783-1801.

M. Plaschy, C. Destouches, G. Rimpault and R. Chawla (Sep 2005), Investigation of ADS-Type Heterogeneities in the MUSE4 Critical Configuration, Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 42[9], 779-787.

G. Hosking, T.D. Newton (2007), Results of Benchmark Considering a High-Temperature Reactor (HTR) Fuelled with Reactor-grade Plutonium, Physics of Plutonium Recycling, Volume VIII, OECD/NEA Nuclear Science Committee.

Zuhair, Suwoto, Maman Mulyaman (2008), Pemodelan Kernel Bahan Bakar dalam Kisi Matriks Grafit untuk Perhitungan Kritikalitas VHTR dengan MCNP5, Prosiding seminar nasional ke-14 teknologi dan keselamatan PLTN serta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.natural-b.2012.001.04.13

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.